Issued Global Fire Power Corporation last classification of the strongest armies in the world, depending on the more than 50 workers to determine the outcome of "PwrIndx" index for each country separately.
This allows the index (based on the factors of 50) developed for small countries in technological terms to compete with larger countries in size and less advanced.
Furthermore, the development of standards in the classification in the form of equations, to grant or discount extra points for each country, will enhance the results of the most accuracy possible.
Here are some important points that have been considered in the category:
Arrangement does not only depend on the number of weapons available for each individual state, but instead focuses on the diversity of this weapon and the balance with the quantities available (ie provide 100 minesweepers does not equal strategic and tactical value to provide 10 aircraft carriers, for example).
Nuclear stockpiles are not taken into account, but the availability of state grant additional points outside the equations.
Geographical factors and flexible logistics and natural resources and local industries affect the final standings.
Available manpower is the primary consideration, that is densely populated countries will move naturally to higher centers.
It does not matter to the landlocked States as deprived of some of the points to the lack of naval forces, because the lack of naval forces only viewed with the lack of diversity in available assets.
NATO allies are getting extra points due to a slight theoretical sharing of resources between Member States.
Current military or political leadership are not taken into account for the states.
The classification of countries in the first 30 positions were as follows:
United States of America
Russia
China
India
France
United kingdom
Japan
Turkey
Germany
Italia
South Korea
Egypt
Pakistan
Indonesia
Brazil
Israel
Vietnam
Poland
Taiwan
Thailand
Iran
Canada
Australia
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
North Korea
Algeria
Spain
Greece
Sweden
Ukraine
This allows the index (based on the factors of 50) developed for small countries in technological terms to compete with larger countries in size and less advanced.
Furthermore, the development of standards in the classification in the form of equations, to grant or discount extra points for each country, will enhance the results of the most accuracy possible.
Here are some important points that have been considered in the category:
Arrangement does not only depend on the number of weapons available for each individual state, but instead focuses on the diversity of this weapon and the balance with the quantities available (ie provide 100 minesweepers does not equal strategic and tactical value to provide 10 aircraft carriers, for example).
Nuclear stockpiles are not taken into account, but the availability of state grant additional points outside the equations.
Geographical factors and flexible logistics and natural resources and local industries affect the final standings.
Available manpower is the primary consideration, that is densely populated countries will move naturally to higher centers.
It does not matter to the landlocked States as deprived of some of the points to the lack of naval forces, because the lack of naval forces only viewed with the lack of diversity in available assets.
NATO allies are getting extra points due to a slight theoretical sharing of resources between Member States.
Current military or political leadership are not taken into account for the states.
The classification of countries in the first 30 positions were as follows:
United States of America
Russia
China
India
France
United kingdom
Japan
Turkey
Germany
Italia
South Korea
Egypt
Pakistan
Indonesia
Brazil
Israel
Vietnam
Poland
Taiwan
Thailand
Iran
Canada
Australia
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
North Korea
Algeria
Spain
Greece
Sweden
Ukraine